Two systems that come to mind are: Diceware In my experience, "easy to remember" and "easy to type" typically means "full English words" my fingers/brain have a much easier time with words than they do with arbitrary sequences of characters. But you seem to already be aware of this. (My average was 3.3 seconds vs 4.0 seconds.) Add to this the slightly higher probability that an easy to type password could end up in a dictionary list, and I'd shy away from it. My conclusion: it's likely to be the case that if you choose any passphrase that is easy to remember, it won't be much slower to type than one that is seemingly more "easy to type". The first couple of times I messed up the "easy to type" password because I was going too fast and bumped other keys. I actually tried it a few times and the time shown above was my last set of 3 for each. Option 2: (10 seconds to type it 3 times) 1234qwerasdfzxcv7890yuiohjklnm. Option 1: (12 seconds to type it 3 times) This password is easy to remember In order to more easily measure the timing with my stopwatch, I typed both passwords 3 times and compared: I just tried an experiment where I choose two passwords, both were easy to remember, and one is (seemingly) much easier to type than the other. The reason is it's not worth it unless you are an extremely slow typist. How to generate easy to type passwords without sacrificing security? I point this out because none of the other answers appear to interpret the question this way. That said, the other answers (and the accepted one) have made me realize that I have been thinking about this the wrong way.ĭisclaimer: I'm interpreting "easy to type" in this question literally to mean consecutive characters or similar typing patterns, which is different from passwords that are "easy to remember". My original intent for "easy to type" was something along the lines of near each other on the keyboard or alternating hands with smooth transitions between, which is why I accepted the answer I did. ** After reading all the answers and comments here. ![]() I am aware that a password manager or something like that would be a more ideal solution but not everyone is willing to incorporate something like that. I am hoping this will take a little bit of the "usability" aspect out of the old adage "Security at the cost of usability comes at the cost of security". Sees various values as they pass through the function if enabled.How can one generate a password that is easy to type but does not sacrifice security? An example of a password that is easy to type but sacrifices security (I imagine) would be this question, we'll use a pretty lax but standard password policy. The maximum number of symbols to include in password. The minimum number of symbols to include in password. The maximum number of digits to include in password. ![]() The minimum number of digits to include in password. The maximum number of upper case characters to include in password. The minimum number of upper case characters to include in password. The maximum number of lower case characters to include in password. The minimum number of lower case characters to include in password. The debug parameter will print certain properties of the command into the War Room for easy diagnostics. ![]() It is therefore recommended to always include a min_* parameter that matches. It is possible that a password of length zero could be generated. This means that if the command is executed in this way: The default behavior is to generate a password of random length including all four character classes, upper, lower, digits, and symbols, with at least five and at most ten characters per class. For example, "password complexity requirements". Generates a password and allows various parameters to customize the properties of the password depending on the use case. This Script is part of the Common Scripts Pack.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |